Tweets

1. @EthylRosenberg » 12 Mar '13, 10pm

   @bobcesca_go Some light reading on that gnarly topic: [link]
2. @lisarpepper » 12 Mar '13, 10pm

   RT @bubblegenius: @bobcesca_go [link]
3. @bubblegenius » 12 Mar '13, 10pm

   @bobcesca_go [link]
4. @AlessCullen » 28 Feb '13, 12am

   RT @OpManning: Most of Earth to be under arrest soon: @ColMorrisDavis: anyone who disseminates classified subject to prosecution [link] #WL
5. @OpManning » 28 Feb '13, 12am

   Most of Earth to be under arrest soon: @ColMorrisDavis: anyone who disseminates classified subject to prosecution [link] #WL
6. @spottymcgoo » 25 Feb '13, 12pm

   RT @SomersetBean: Never mind facts re #Assange RT @gerge42 @bobjcarr Congressional Research Service mentions WL GJ as fact: [link] … … #qanda
7. @SomersetBean » 25 Feb '13, 12pm

   Never mind facts re #Assange RT @gerge42 @bobjcarr Congressional Research Service mentions WL GJ as fact: [link] … … #qanda
8. @SomersetBean » 25 Feb '13, 12pm

   RT @gerge42: @bobjcarr Congressional Research Service mentions WL GJ as fact: [link] … #qanda
9. @gerge42 » 25 Feb '13, 12pm

   @bobjcarr Congressional Research Service mentions WL GJ as fact: [link] … #qanda
10. @gerge42 » 25 Feb '13, 12pm

    @bobjcarr Congressional Research Service mentions WL GJ as fact: [link]
11. @nathanLfuller » 16 Feb '13, 11pm

    @emptywheel Or if the government will soon cite Bradley Manning's 'dual US-British citizenship' in denying his rights [link]
12. @VincentAbinet » 14 Feb '13, 11pm

    RT @ulvdis: PING! Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information January 31, 2013 [link] #assange @wikileaks
13. @ulvdis » 14 Feb '13, 11pm

    Classified US ops abroad have led 2 calls from Congress 4 an investigation into the source of the leaks [link] #assange
14. @ulvdis » 14 Feb '13, 10pm

    PING! Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information January 31, 2013 [link] #assange @wikileaks
15. @ulvdis » 14 Feb '13, 10pm

    NB>>> Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information January 31, 2013 [link] #assange @akaWAKA
16. @sevensheeps » 14 Feb '13, 7pm

    @stacyherbert New Congressional Reseach Service report on the U.S. prosecution of leaks. #Wikileaks (PDF) [link] … …
17. @sevensheeps » 14 Feb '13, 7pm

    New Congressional Reseach Service report on the U.S. prosecution of leaks. #Wikileaks (PDF) [link] …
18. @JesselynRadack » 14 Feb '13, 6pm

    Cong Resrch Serv takes govt position on #classified leaks: publication is protected, but sources will B crim prossed [link]
19. @kgosztola » 14 Feb '13, 6pm

    RT @JesselynRadack: SLOPPY: In one pargrph, Cong Resrch Serv gets 6 major things wrong abt '@Thomas_Drake1 #espionage case. [link] #Inexcusable
20. @JesselynRadack » 14 Feb '13, 6pm

    SLOPPY: In one pargrph, Cong Resrch Serv gets 6 major things wrong abt '@Thomas_Drake1 #espionage case. [link] #Inexcusable
21. @ABetterPeople » 14 Feb '13, 6pm

    “@carwinb: Congressional Research Svc says civilians in #Manning case could be charged w/ 'aiding enemy' p 3 [link]”
22. @Thomas_Drake1 » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    CRS report parrots & mimes gov't meme in my case. Truth? All 10 felony counts dropped. Not charged w/ disclosure. [link]
23. @bloggergate » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    RT @krmaher: 30 page CRS report on the constitutionality and criminality of leaking: [link]
24. @Thomas_Drake1 » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    CRS report misrepresents my case. No mention that I blew whistle on NSA multi-B$ fraud, illegal secret surveillance. [link]
25. @KWSnet » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    "Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information" Jennifer K. Elsea (CRS, 31 Jan 2013) [link]
26. @nathanLfuller » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    "disclosures by government employees [get] no First Amendment protection, regardless of the motives of the divulger" [link]
27. @krmaher » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    30 page CRS report on the constitutionality and criminality of leaking: [link]
28. @JesselynRadack » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    Cong Resrch Serv discusses clients '@Thomas_Drake1 & '@JohnKiriakou as part of Obama's #EspionageAct "tirade." [link]
29. @Thomas_Drake1 » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    If gov't deems ANY info classified then ANY person disclosing becomes a criminal under nat sec rule, inc press/media [link]
30. @Massimo_Masini » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    RT @kgosztola: CRS report analyzes whether publishers of classified info, including press, can be prosecuted [link]
31. @kgosztola » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    CRS report analyzes whether publishers of classified info, including press, can be prosecuted [link]
32. @gerge42 » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    @SandraEckersley Congressional Research Service says civilians in WL BM case could be charged w/ 'aiding enemy' p 3 [link] …
33. @JesselynRadack » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    Cong Resrch Serv: 6 other crim statutes more appropriate than overcharging #EspionageAct 2 pros #classified disclsrs [link]
34. @nathanLfuller » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    Espionage Act can cover foreign nationals "when they take an active part in seeking out information" pg. 30: [link] #Assange
35. @DragonflyKid » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    RT @nathanLfuller: 1/9: Gov: we'd charge Manning same way if leaked to NYT: [link] 1/31: Congress explores charging NYT: [link]
36. @nathanLfuller » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    1/9: Gov: we'd charge Manning same way if leaked to NYT: [link] 1/31: Congress explores charging NYT: [link]
37. @Thomas_Drake1 » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    Under military authority gov't could charge "any person" w/ UCMJ Article 104 "aiding the enemy" inc media&reporters. [link]
38. @nathanLfuller » 14 Feb '13, 5pm

    Report for Congress exploring legality of prosecuting media for publishing classified info: [link] cc @Sulliview @wikileaks
39. @onekade » 14 Feb '13, 4pm

    RT @Thomas_Drake1: CRS says on p.3 in #Manning case gov't cud indict civilians it links 2 WikiLeaks under "any person" in UCMJ Art 104. [link]
40. @Thomas_Drake1 » 14 Feb '13, 4pm

    CRS says on p.3 in #Manning case gov't cud indict civilians it links 2 WikiLeaks under "any person" in UCMJ Art 104. [link]
41. @BeAnEarthNut » 14 Feb '13, 3pm

    re-post,yeah people need to read this PDF Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information [link]
42. @BMqueerfriends » 14 Feb '13, 2pm

    RT @auerfeld: Congressional Research Service report freely describes #BradleyManning as a "dual US-British citizen" [link] ht @carwinb
43. @auerfeld » 14 Feb '13, 2pm

    Congressional Research Service report freely describes #BradleyManning as a "dual US-British citizen" [link] ht @carwinb
44. @_cypherpunks_ » 14 Feb '13, 12pm

    Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information [link] (pdf) #CRS
45. @CrisAintMarchin » 14 Feb '13, 12pm

    #journalists alert! @ColMorrisDavis: CRS report: anyone distrib. classified info subject 2prosecution [link] #WikiLeaks”
46. @RandyWhite64 » 14 Feb '13, 12pm

    RT @ColMorrisDavis: CRS Report cites Drake, Kiriakou, Manning, says anyone who disseminates classified subject to prosecution [link] #WikiLeaks
47. @ColMorrisDavis » 14 Feb '13, 12pm

    CRS Report cites Drake, Kiriakou, Manning, says anyone who disseminates classified subject to prosecution [link] #WikiLeaks
48. @carwinb » 14 Feb '13, 12pm

    Congressional Research Service says civilians in #WikiLeaks #Manning case could be charged w/ 'aiding enemy' p 3 [link]
49. @Nin_99 » 14 Feb '13, 11am

    RT @JLLLOW: Important analysis by the Congressional Research Service on which US laws may be used to punish leakers [link] #wikileaks
50. @JLLLOW » 14 Feb '13, 11am

    Important analysis by the Congressional Research Service on which US laws may be used to punish leakers [link] #wikileaks